Friday, December 24, 2004

Isaiah's Eve

Tis Christmas Eve. A day of many different meanings. For the retailer, it is one last attempt to sell the customer items most of them don't need and most of them can't afford. For the customer, it is the final day to purchase gifts to show they care about their friends and family. As if somehow the amount of money I spend indicates the amount I care about a person. For the Christian, it is the day before God becomes flesh in the birth of Jesus (even if it is historically inaccurate since most scholars believe Jesus was born in the spring). Since we are on the verge or on the "eve" on Christ's coming to earth, I must ask what else are we on the eve of?

Have we approached the eve of seeing racism come to an end? Are we on the eve of seeing Israeli and Palestinian joining hands around Jerusalem? Have we approached the eve of ending Iraqi suffering? Are we on the eve of ending the torture of detainees? Are we on the eve of seeing abortion and the death penalty as the same murderous act of ending life? Are we on the eve of all nations denying themselves nuclear weapons? Are we on the eve of forgiving those who hurt us and reconciling with those we have selfishly forsaken for our desire of revenge?
Are we are on the eve of building a bridge over the canyon that separates the rich and poor?

If you answer to the following questions is No, then I ask you to defend your answer. You might use a quick answer of it is too idealistic to believe such things will come. Or maybe that the world's present course shows no signs of approaching such a vision. Exactly, we must change course.

If you answer Yes, then this Christmas season let you and I also celebrate Isaiah's Eve because we both believe that we are on the eve of witessing Isaiah's vision become reality.

Isaiah 11
The Branch From Jesse 1 A shoot will come up from the stump of Jesse;
from his roots a Branch will bear fruit.
2 The Spirit of the LORD will rest on him-
the Spirit of wisdom and of understanding,
the Spirit of counsel and of power,
the Spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the LORD -
3 and he will delight in the fear of the LORD .

He will not judge by what he sees with his eyes,
or decide by what he hears with his ears;
4 but with righteousness he will judge the needy,
with justice he will give decisions for the poor of the earth.
He will strike the earth with the rod of his mouth;
with the breath of his lips he will slay the wicked.
5 Righteousness will be his belt
and faithfulness the sash around his waist.

6 The wolf will live with the lamb,
the leopard will lie down with the goat,
the calf and the lion and the yearling [a] together;
and a little child will lead them.
7 The cow will feed with the bear,
their young will lie down together,
and the lion will eat straw like the ox.
8 The infant will play near the hole of the cobra,
and the young child put his hand into the viper's nest.
9 They will neither harm nor destroy
on all my holy mountain,
for the earth will be full of the knowledge of the LORD
as the waters cover the sea.

It is naive to celebrate Isaiah's vision? If so, then Isaiah and the shoot of Jesse (Jesus) are also naive to believe such things will come to past. But I believe in the passion of Isaiah's vision and see it as the only way the world can exist if it wishes to survive. We must all play a part if the vision is to be fulfilled. It is time to stop brushing off the visions of the prophets like Isaiah and the teachings of Jesus as too idealistic and not applicable to today's world. Isaiah's Eve is upon us and soon after will come Isaiah's Day. A day when peace and unconditional love will flood the earth. Will it happen tomorrow? Probably not. But we must begin seeking it today.

Read more...

Thursday, December 16, 2004

The Nashville Gospel

I've decided to post weekly instead of daily. New posts will be posted each Friday so to give you something to chew on over the weekend.

Today's post is inspired by my college experience in Nashville, TN. Among its many titles, Nashville is known as the "buckle of the Bible belt". It is city with a church of Christ on every corner. Yet there somehow remains a terrible gap between wealth and poverty. Only in New York City is there a greater disparity between the wealthy and those in poverty. New York City, however, doesn't claim to support any one religion, but Nashville claims to be the buckle of the bible belt.

I'm not talking about a creek of disparity, I'm talking about a canyon of difference between Nashville's wealthiest and poorest. Now it might be an obvious conclusion that a church in the bible belt would preach about the gap between rich and poor. You also expect that church to be convicted and go a step further to find ways to bridge that gap. But somehow some Christians who attend the likes of Woodmount, Brentwood Hills and Otter Creek seem to pretend that this gap does not exist. They seem content to spend the excess of God's fruits on large houses, large SUVs and large credit card bills.

I'm positive the lots of Christians in Nashville give lots of money to missions abroad. But as they fund missions overseas, they neglect the single mother down the street who has to choose between feeding the kids and paying the utility bills. The sad reality is that most Christians in Nashville have enough to assist both the foreign mission and the single mother struggling to provide for her family.

This practice of giving out of the excess of one's fruits is an attribute of what I call the Nashville Gospel. The Nashville Gospel is a guilt-free approach to living the ethic of Jesus. The Nashville Gospel allows one to give some of their excess to those in need and at the same time doesn't require one to deny themselves their expensive possessions. You can have your cake and eat it too with the Nashville Gospel. The Nashville Gospel believes the "last shall be first" to be foolish thinking.

Fortunately the Nashville Gospel is not the gospel of the New Testament. The gospel of the New Testament is about a king born in a barn who owned nothing and gave everything.

Read more...

Friday, December 10, 2004

Letting Go Of Death Row

Scott Peterson's fate between life and death will soon decided.

Can man legitimately destroy man? Can a created being destroy his or her fellow man? Even in the most haneous of acts, should a criminal recieve capital punishment as an answer to his or her crime?

The question is not, does a man like scott petterson deserve death? Because the answer is always yes. It is not what does Scott deserve, it is what should he recieve?

In the eyes of God, all have fallen short and therefore all are guitly. Our human instinct is to classify sins into categories of big and small. The reality, however, is that sin is sin. God measures no difference between a simple lie i tell or scott's killing his family.

Every human being who sins deserves to be put to death. It our sins that nail Christ to the cross. With everyday that passes is another day i nail Christ on the cross. What do i deserve? I deserve for God to strike me dead where i stand. But what do i recieve? Grace which i can't repay.

I close with a verse from a powerful hymn, " He could of called ten thousand angels to detroy the world and set him free. But he died alone for you and me."

Read more...

Sunday, December 05, 2004

My Vision of The Good Society: If Anyone Cares?

Through out its history America has been given numerous opportunities to start over and establish the Good Society. Many administrations have tried to establish their vision of the Good Society, and many administrations have failed to make their vision a reality. The common fallacy in their visions is in the notion that the Good Society must be enforced to be successful. The Good Society, however, cannot be enforced. The true Good Society will become a permanent reality only when a society freely chooses to be earnest seekers and non-violent defenders of peace, justice and equality.

One of the core elements of the Good Society is peace. The Good Society does not have an imperialistic mindset, which America had during the late 19th Century. America is not the only nation to have the desire to rule the world. Some nations have been on the brink of making their desire a reality. The Good Society understands that the imperialistic desire to rule the world will eventually bring even the greatest of nations to ruin. The Good Society does not massacre an entire race of people, as America decimated the Native Americans, to obtain fresh farmland. The Good Society does not force the survivors of those massacres unto tiny reservations in order to expand its borders. The Good Society is content with its borders and at peace with its neighbors. It has no desire to be a global power. It realizes that imperialistic gain is always at the expense of another nation’s lost. The Good Society is not like past nations who sought to build on the ashes of those nations they destroyed. The Good Society instead seeks to unite the world by building bridges of peace.

The Good Society does not use violence to achieve peace. Through out history America has thought the only way to achieve peace is by destroying the enemy. It is one of the greatest paradoxes when a nation tries to achieve peace through war. Civil Rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. could see better than anyone the fallacy in a war policy that seeks peace. He believed all of life to be interrelated. In an interrelated world King believed it was impossible to separate the means a society uses and the end it seeks. He saw the means as the seeds and the ends as the trees. You cannot plant seeds of war and expect a tree of peace to spring forth. The Good Society believes, as King did, that peace is not just some distant goal we seek, but it is also the means by which we seek our goal. The Good Society cannot exist in a society where vengeance and hate abound. The Good Society can only survive when its means are a peace that produce compromise and reconciliation.

In the Good society intense nationalism is a threat to the peace that is essential. War World II serves as a prime example of what the Good Society is not to embody. The war was painted as a battle between the good Allied forces against the evil Axis forces. The Good Society does not partake in the myth that in war one nation is ultimately good and their adversary is ultimately evil. The Good Society holds to the belief that all nations who engage in war are evil in some form. It does matter to the Good Society the quantity of evil actions because one ounce of evil is too much. Vietnam serves as another example of war painted in the moralistic terms of good and evil. The Good Society makes no distinction between the evil actions of Viet Cong soldiers and the evil consequences of napalm bombing. If the Good Society is to be true to itself, it can only overcome evil with good. It must be careful not to fall into the naive trap, as America did in WW II and Vietnam, that it is somehow so good that it is incapable of evil. In the end the Good Society must abstain from the necessary evil of war and always seek the necessary good of peace.

Another core element to the Good Society is justice. In the Good Society true justice is color blind. A criminal in the Good Society is judged on the seriousness of the crime, not the color of his or her skin. American courts have always struggled to separate to color of the suspect and the alleged crime committed. For most of American history it was the African American who was convicted in spite of evidence that proved his or her innocence. In recent times it is Arab Americana whose conviction has everything to do with skin color and nothing to do with the fact they may actually be innoence. The Good Society, however, offers justice to anyone who seeks is. It does not deny anyone access to legal representation and does not detain anyone who has not been charged with a crime. The Good Society determines guilt with evidence, not with assumptions. The Good Society does not intend to be a perfect society, but in order to be a Good Society it must provide colorblind justice.

True justice must also provide economic justice. Many in corporate America during the Gilded Age adopted the economic philosophy of “Social Darwinism”. Corporate America took Darwin’s biological theory of “Survival of the Fittest” and put it into practice in their everyday business transactions. It was longer considered immoral to muscle out your competitor because it was seen as a natural consequence of the economic order. Greed was not only good during the Gilded Age, it was encouraged.

The Good Society does not practice greed in any form. It does not participate in the injustices that greed produces. There is no canyon between rich and poor like there was between Carnegie and the rest of America. In the Good Society 1% of the total population does not own the majority of wealth as is the case in America today. The Good Society holds a company like Enron to account for its actions against their employees and customers. The business of the Good Society is not to make a profit by any means necessary. The business of the Good Society is to provide economic justice for those who are so easily trampled underneath by the Industrial machine. True justice is not for sale in the Good Society. True justice does need to be color blind, but it is not enough. The Good Society knows that if justice can be bought, then the color of your skin will matter less than the color of your money.

The Good Society does not preserve true justice through war, but through law. History is filled with nations who believed that war was an effective way to preserve justice. They assume if an unjust nation is not confronted with force, then the injustice will spread. The Good Society must learn from the mistakes of past nations. War is an action taken a political entity. Law enforcement, however, does not presume all to be guilty, but justly holds individuals to account for their actions. War is always imprecise and the violence it creates is always general. There are no distinctions made in war for both civilian and militant are killed in war. Law enforcement is a direct action taken against specific individuals. War is less concerned with procedure than results. Law enforcement must stick to procedure to be effective. The Good Society does not engage in terrorist-like methods to preserve justice. War has its own momentum which few can stop. Law enforcement has its momentum controlled by a system of checks and balances. Through law the Good Society preserves true justice not only for the individual, but for the entire community as well. The Good Society realizes war does not end injustice, buy only promotes it by destroying everything in its path. The Good Society will find true justice in the law as those who engage in war continue to search for it.

The final core element of the Good Society is equality. The Good Society desires to give everyone an equal opportunity. In the Good Society everyone is provided with the best possible education to ensure an equal starting point. The Good Society will also provide an equal opportunity to work which allows one to provide for his or her family. The Good Society is not a communist state with the naïve belief that everyone is equal in every aspect of life. Though people have unequal abilities, they must still be given an equal opportunity to learn and discover their abilities. A person’s ability may be greater, but his or her opportunity will remain equal.

American history is full of great contradictions. In the Declaration of Independence the founding fathers state, “all are created equal”. These words were suppose to apply to all men and women, but the oppressive institution of slavery was allowed to continue for almost a hundred years after these words were written. Women could own property, but were not allowed to vote on property taxes. This nauseating double speak of American government is best described by Martin Luther King Jr. when he says, “ These men so often have a high blood pressure of words and an anemia of deeds”. The Good Society is tired of these contradictions and will seek to embody the words of the founding fathers. No one in the Good Society is 3/5 a person as the African American was in Colonial America. The Good Society will equally respect every human life in all circumstances. Whether it be man or woman, black or white, rich or poor, friend or foe; every life in the Good Society has dignity and worth. The Good Society will not speak in contradictions that a man can be both equal and a slave. The Good Society will speak in truth the reality that all men are created equal.

The three core elements of the Good Society are deeply interrelated. You cannot have peace unless you embrace justice. You cannot have justice unless you uphold equality. The core elements of the Good Society set the foundation upon which the community will be built. The key to survival for the Good Society is not to protect a false sense of “national security”. It will only endure by adopting a policy of peace. The Good Society cannot expect to last if it justifies the use of torture as a means to protect its citizens. It can only protect its citizens by embracing justice. The Good Society cannot continue with the economic mindset of “Survival of the Fittest”. It can only remain by upholding the equality of all men and women.

Even with these core elements, the Good Society is still dependent on something else. It is dependent on whether the society will choose to seek and defend peace, justice and equality. The government of both Reconstruction and the Civil Rights movement believed that they had to create to laws to enforce the ideals of the Good Society. The problem, however, is that a law which desegregates schools does not remove the hate from a person’s heart. You can’t force some one to live in the Good Society. A person’s free will negates to the notion of an involuntary acceptance of the Good Society. If people are forced against their will to choose something, then it isn’t real. Many empires of the past believed in the myth that in order to become a great society one must practice war, discrimination and unfairness. The reality of the Good Society, however, is that if a society is to exist at all, then it must observe peace, justice, and equality.

Read more...

Saturday, November 20, 2004

For Fallujah Family, a Daring Escape

Read more...

Monday, November 01, 2004

Casual Discipleship

Pe 3:15 15But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always beprepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reasonfor the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect

In my attempt to sincerely express my belief in abstaining fromthe political process and all it entails I must begin with the most important question. What does Peter mean when he says, " set apart Christ as Lord"? At baptism all of us confessed Jesus is the Son of Godand Lord of our lives. Is confessing Jesus as Lord a casual expression?Does it entail a casual relationship? Does it necessitate a casual discipleship?

What is wrong with voting and participation in politics? In my view I see political elections as contests to see who is the greatest. It is a contest to see who has the greater credentials, the greater platform and the greater person. Political candidates seek to grab at the mantle of power. One can never have enough power in politics. They seek power no matter what the consequences. Many people see voting as power. We don't need to help decide who is greatest because Jesus already has an answer for us. We don't need to seek after power because the upside down kingdom of the suffering servant belongs to the poor in spirit.

What does the upside down kingdom looks like? It stands incomplete contrast to the fallen world in which we live. Those who want to live must die to themselves. Those who want to become rich must become poor. Those who want to be wise will look foolish to the world. Jesus says in Jn 18:36, "36Jesus said, "My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jews. But now my kingdom is from another place." We are called to first seek this kingdom as it says in Mt 6:33, "33But seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well."In baptism I became a citizen of this kingdom. The waters of baptism were the voting booth and The Father, The Son and The Holy Spirit became my elected officials.

For those of you who are married, is your marriage a casual relationship where you are free to come and go as you please. Absolutely not, those of you who are married are the most committed husbands I know and fully appreciate the gift God has given you. The commitment to our relationship with God is the same. The disciple belongs to the Lord as Paul says in Ro 14:8, "8If we live, we live to the Lord; and if we die,we die to the Lord. So, whether we live or die, we belong to the Lord."A disciple may succumb to many gods or idols, but he or she can onlyserve the One God as found in 1 Co8:6 "6yet for us there is but one God,the Father, from whom all things came and for whom we live; and there is but one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things came and through whom we live." The disciple cannot sit at two tables as Paul says in 1Co10:21, " 21You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons too; you cannot have a part in both the Lord's table and the table of demons." Paul calls disciples us not to conform to this pagan world, but to be transformed in Romans 12:2, "2Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind.Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will is--his good,pleasing and perfect will." Many see voting as always choosing the lesser of two evils. No candidate is perfect so some values must be sacrificed for the greater good. The disciple, however, does not lookfor the necessary evil that will sustain him or her, but is always searching for the necessary good which can transform them. In closing I would like to answer Jeremy's question. If I am so disinterested in voting and politics, then why do I open my mouth? It is because I desire to bring light to the darkness. It is a tradition that dates back to the prophets of the Old Testament. Amos especially was not afraid to critique Israel and its sin. Jesus himself was not involved in the political process and still confronted the Pharisees and the RomanEmpire. Paul is another great example of one who was disinterested, but still held the Empire accountable. Many misuse Romans 13 to justify all kinds of government action. But we forget that Paul is writing his letters from jail as he writes in Eph 4:1, "1As a prisoner for the Lord,then, I urge you to live a life worthy of the calling you have received." Good, upstanding citizens don't get thrown into jail. Only one who stands in opposition to the Empire and refuses to participate in its pursuit for power is thrown in jail.

Gal 6:17, "17Finally, let no one cause me trouble, for I bear on my body the marks of Jesus". Are we prepared to bear the marks of Christ? He is not talking about a birth mark, but the scars from the whippings, the bruises from the punches and the scabs from the bleeding.The marks of Christ are the cost of committed discipleship. I believe voting and trusting political officials to be true to the kingdom allows many Christians to become casual disciples. I don't want to come across as being the 100% committed disciple. Though I believe I have made Jesus my Lord in regards to voting and political participation. I still have many areas in my life where Jesus is not Lord, the way I waste money and my language just to name a few. I apologize to for the lengthy explanation, but I am so grateful we can peacefully communicate our beliefs without name calling and still remain brothers. God be with all of us as we seek to transform from casual disciples to committed disciples who take seriously our confession that Jesus Christ is Lord.

Read more...

  © Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP